Deconstructing a Print Advertisement
Step 1-Observations:
Adjectives
to describe the advertisement:
Fit:
Sexy: Tan: Feminine: Tasty
Aesthetics analysis:
There is the
same woman in the ad in 2 different images.
One is physically fit, wearing a bright pink bikini with open arms
highlighting her chest, abs and butt. The
other picture is the same woman, smaller image, wearing dark clothing, sunglasses
with her arms folded and hair hanging forward in attempt to cover up her
weight. To the right are diet
supplements and protein replacement shakes specifically designed for
women. Most of the text on the page is
small except for the heading “I lost 60- pounds… and became an IFBB bikini pro!”
which is significantly bigger font and partially in color.
Step 2- Purpose:
The product
being marketed is Labrada Lean Body replacement shakes and Lean Body diet
pills.
It is
appealing for the target audience of younger women, ages 18-35, because of the feminine
colors used and the woman has dark complexion with long dark hair, tanned in a
pink bikini, which is a stereotypically an ideal image for most women.
The
advertisement is trying to draw on a women’s desire for a perfect self-image
and that a replacement shakes are tasty ways to lose weight. I would believe
that this ad is effective in its delivery for the general target audience.
Step 3 – Message Sent
The message
conveyed in the ad is that the average sized woman wearing black with dark
sunglasses is overweight, which she is not, and undesirable. Whereas
the woman in the forefront of the ad is the more desirable look for a woman and
the way to obtain that body type is to use the supplements and the meal
replacement shakes. The woman’s race is
not clear from my perspective however she is very tan with dark hair and exotic
features.
Step 4 – Consequences of the message
The ad definitely
portrays unrealistic expectations for women.
Not only is it showing a skewed image of the typical woman but it also
falsely represents what it takes to obtain and maintain a body that is so
clearly portrayed in the ad.
Today’s
society is moving towards acceptance of every body type and size, at times to a
fault, I believe this image is depicting an unobtainable goal for most of
American women. In reality, the amount
of women who are able to achieve a body like this one is few and those who do,
the ability to maintain that body for a long period of time is difficult and at
times unhealthy.
As stated in
the video Killing Us Softly 3 Jean
states, “advertising tell us what we should be… what’s at stake is the ability
to have authentic and freely chosen lives.”
This ad is a clear depiction of the paradigm that is discussed in the
video. If being physically fit means
being a clone of the woman in the forefront of the picture then most women will
work their entire lives and never achieve a physically fit status.
Nice job on your deconstruction. This is the perfect ad to use as an illustration of the importance of critical media literacy in K-12 education today. Young women, and men, need to know how to make these advertisements transparent to themselves and see them for the value, or lack of value, that they have. For example, if you are willing to read past the large font and read all of the text in the ad, it is clear that going to the gym, weight lifting, and kickboxing were as important, if not more important, than the diet supplement.
ReplyDeleteI also noticed it said that her initial weight was 165 pounds. It's hard to tell how tall she is but if she was say...5'9" then her initial weight was actually normal. Even if she was 5'4" she would only be about 20 pounds overweight according to most height / weight charts for women (which doesn't seem like a lot to me, I am 40 pounds overweight according to my charts) and after losing 60 pounds she is drastically underweight. She may look good but she's probably not healthy.
DeleteHi Matthew -
ReplyDeleteYes that was my initial thought, she looked good in her initial picture and how the 60 lb text presents a skewed perception.
I have competed in female bodybuilding for a few years. I am only 5'3" and on stage I was 3% body fat at 128 lbs and was a heavy weight. Off season I try to maintain about 150 with 9-11% body fat, which is considered overweight by the charts.
These ads have always bothered me because even in fitness magazines whether for men or women they always focused on the bikini or figure models, they never used the female bodybuilders for any marketing. They also never show what off season looks like, which is, depending on which league you compete, up to 8 months of the year.
For those of us in the world of physical competition or for the average female this ad is dangerous if used to compare ourselves.