When working through this week’s assigned readings
and video, I felt as if there was a different approach and purpose for
each. In Raquel Recuero’s google chat
with fellow colleagues, it appeared to be information sharing about youths in
Brazil in regards to social media and having a voice. Whereas, Saskia Sasses’s was a persuasive
talk very politically driven with a certain agenda implied.
The
tools used in both of the talks appear to be the same, the Internet, blogging
and social media. The issues,
from my understanding, are also the same, which was most clearly stated in the reading by Mark E. Kann, “online
talk tends to be undisciplined, intolerant, and superficial rather than
deliberative. Furthermore publicly
sponsored web sites rarely take advantage of the Internet’s interactive possibilities.”
(Kann, p1/3) Another issues facing both
talk was how it relates to distribution of political participation. (Varnellis, video) In my opinion at the core of this issue
stands the cultural and critical dimension literacy (Lankshear and Knobel,
p175), the culture of politics is trying to embed itself into the digital
culture, which hasn’t fully matured enough to be able to articulate its values
of the culture. It creates an
interesting paradigm. For example,
Raquel indicated that many of the topics were for the first time being
discussed openly in media because of social media. Yet then in Brazil, similar to
some institutions in the US, social media is forbidden in academic institutions. (Brazil, video)
I
was intrigued with the Google hang out with Raquel and colleagues, I felt it was a very
real discussions of the current issues and phenomena with emergence and
increased fluency in digital literacy. However,
I didn't feel the same with Sassen’s blog. It was heavily laden with jargon and ideas
communicated in a complex manner which led to less contextual force personally, however it may have been a successful delivery based on her target audience.
Lankshear, C. and Knoble, M. (2011 ). Literacies:
Social, Cultural, and Historical Perspectives. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Kann, M. (n.d.) Networed Publics: More or Less
Democracy in the Internet Age. Retrieved
on October 14, 2013 from http://networkedpublics.org/digital_democracy/more_or_less_democracy_in_the_internet_age
Varnellis, K. (2012) Saskia Sassen:
Networks, Power, and Democracy. [video
file] Retrieved on October 16, 2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpw1GpHzAbc&feature=youtu.be
Brazil, J. (n.d.) Raquel Recuero - Digital Youth, Social
Movements, and Democracy in Brazil.
[video file] Retrieved on October 15, 2013 from http://connectedlearning.tv/raquel-recuero-digital-youth-social-movements-and-democracy-brazil
Michele,
ReplyDeleteYou make an interesting comparison between Raquel's discussion and Sassen. I too felt the latter was a little heavy but it probably was the targeted audience as well as the focus of the presentation.
I also think we that the political forum has not truly evolved in the digital world yet but I am sure we will continue to see transitions over time. Part of the problem may be that most people feel they can make an impact in a more local setting opposed to a national scale and this may not be so conducive to using the Internet.
Lydia
Lydia,
DeleteI also think that our political forum has a lot of evolving to catch up with, but it is the local settings that set the standards for which the national setting can be judged. By becoming involved locally we can find what works and that can be used as a microcosm for the larger picture. Just as in Raquel's discussion about Brazil, we can take what is and is not working from them and apply it to ourselves, both personally and on a larger scale.
Sean
Well stated, Lydia and Sean. I'm sure we will continue to see the digital world evolve tremendously. I just wonder, if those who have a strong digital voice will have the same voice or actions outside of the digital world. Or will it just be words with no action. Voices (text) can be powerful and grab media attention quickly, but there is so much happening globally at a rapid pace, what will the voice accomplish without follow up action?
ReplyDelete