Below is my end of semester
reflection from the New Media and New Literacies class from Empire State
College. As it is my first semester in
the MALET program, I feel that I have gained a lot of knowledge and
understanding of how technology is changing and will forever be changing our
world.
Strengths: identify the strong points of your performance or
understanding thus far. Give specific examples and tell why they are considered
strengths.
I feel as if the one thing I know I can hang
my hat on through this first semester of the MALET program is that I have
professional life experience. Many of
the topics discussed and concepts researched are living breathing issues I face
daily in my career. I can imagine it may
be a challenge for someone coming into this program with little real world
application, they may have a hard time envisioning application of the topics
discussed.
The two topics that resonated with me the
most were the Digital Immigrant/Digital Native topic and Participatory Culture
and Media Literacy. These topics were
very real in my professional world and I was able to see direct correlation immediately.
Improvements: identify any areas that you see are in need of
improvement. Include how these improvements can be made in during the remainder
of the term
The one area I have a hard time understanding
is how everything relates to one another, not just within this course but in the
big picture schema. I feel as if some of
the information is slightly disjointed.
All very interesting topics however there are time I have had a hard
time grasping the concept completely because I don’t know how it fits into the
big picture of my environment.
The one example in this class has been the Networked
Publics readings. I felt it was a
very intellectual read and provided a lot of good discussion but I’m not quite
sure how it fits into the big picture of New Literacies. Most of our other readings and discussions
were discussing how the new media affected literacy and this piece, from what I
was able to extract, was more a discussion about the ethics of the networked
places and what the future hold for the networked environments.
Some of the disjointed feeling I experienced
may have been from taking two classes simultaneously. I have not been a traditional student for
some time (if we can even call this traditional), so it may be my learning
curve.
Insights: identify any insights that you have had about
yourself or about the content. Discuss how you can "take away" this
new knowledge and apply it to other contexts.
Since the midterm evaluation, I have been
able to get a better handle on the vocabulary in the literature. I have now seen it used several times. I’m sure it will continue to be on my radar
throughout the program.
Looking at what I have learned about myself
throughout this course has been interesting.
One component that stands out to me is that I previously may have judged
an individual who may not have been as digitally literate negatively, because I
didn’t view it as a literacy. For
example, if someone (i.e.. My mom) was unable to use her IPhone I may have judged
her negatively. However, now I see it as
a lack of literacy (which may be present for many reasons), she does not know
the symbols (icons) or jargon of the phone.
I now view it from a linguistic perspective of literacy and place less
judgment.
As I continue to change how I look at what it
means to be digitally literate, I have gone back to the micro-trainings I have
developed for our LMS and realize that not everyone will have the same literacy
level. One example, I have had to change
the approach for how the ‘slides’ progress throughout the training.
I continue to learn and grow in this program
and I look forward to the next semester.